Midori SocietyPolitical & Social Analysis

知識ベース検索

哲学・政治学・経済学・社会学・論理学の知識を横断的に検索します。

「fallacy」の検索結果:20件(5分野)

論理学 14

logic.md

4. The Complete Fallacy Taxonomy

A **fallacy** is a pattern of reasoning that is psychologically persuasive but logically defective. The system's detector (`analyzer/fallacy.py`) ships 35 named fallacies with Japanese and Latin names, severity, examples, and counter-strategies; the `fallacy` CLI command and the web app surface them...
fallacy cross-references every fallacy the analyzer detects
logic.md

4. The Complete Fallacy Taxonomy / 4.1 Formal Fallacies (defects of logical form)

- **Affirming the consequent** — see §2. - **Denying the antecedent** — see §2. - **Undistributed middle** — see §2. - **Fallacy of Composition** ⚙: what is true of the parts is inferred true of the whole ("each soldier is expendable, so the army is expendable"). Note the *paradox of thrift*: indivi...
Affirming the consequent Denying the antecedent Undistributed middle Fallacy of Composition Fallacy of Division Gambler's Fallacy
logic.md

12. The Fallacy Fallacy and the Limits of Logic-Chopping

- **The fallacy fallacy (argumentum ad logicam)**: concluding that a claim is *false* because an argument *for* it is fallacious. A poorly argued true claim is still true. Detecting a fallacy refutes the *argument*, not necessarily the *conclusion*. - **Logic is necessary but not sufficient**: valid...
The fallacy fallacy (argumentum ad logicam) Logic is necessary but not sufficient Charity over "gotcha" Reasonable disagreement is real
logic.md

4. The Complete Fallacy Taxonomy / 4.7 Analyzer Cross-Reference Table (every fallacy `analyzer/fallacy.py` detects)

The detector ships these named fallacies (each with Japanese/Latin names, severity, example, and counter-strategy). Use this table to connect a flagged fallacy to its theory above and its honest counter-move. | Fallacy (analyzer) | Category | Type above | One-line counter-strategy | |---|---|---|--...
fallacy fallacy
logic.md

Logic — Reasoning and Argumentation

Logic is the discipline that studies the principles of valid inference. For political reasoning it is the master tool: it lets us separate *what follows* from *what merely sounds persuasive*, expose hidden premises, and grade the strength of competing arguments. This file gives the full apparatus — ...
logic.md

14. Glossary of Core Terms

- **Argument**: premises offered in support of a conclusion. - **Premise**: a statement offered as a reason. - **Conclusion**: the statement the premises are meant to support. - **Valid**: (deductive) the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. - **Sound**: valid + all premises true. - **S...
Argument Premise Conclusion Valid Sound Strong / weak
logic.md

13. How to Use This File in Analysis

1. **Find the conclusion** (inference indicators) and reconstruct the argument charitably (steelman). 2. **Classify the inference**: deductive (test validity), inductive (test strength + evidence quality), or abductive (test against rival explanations). 3. **Run the Toulmin grid**: surface the hidde...
Find the conclusion Classify the inference Run the Toulmin grid Screen for fallacies Quantify uncertainty Map
logic.md

11. Worked Examples (logic applied to real political arguments) / Example G — sorites / continuum fallacy weaponized

> "There's no precise income at which someone stops being 'middle class,' so the whole category is meaningless and we shouldn't target tax relief by class." - **Continuum fallacy** (§10b): vagueness of a boundary does not abolish the distinction (a bald man exists though "bald" is vague). The right ...
Continuum fallacy
logic.md

11. Worked Examples (logic applied to real political arguments) / Example C — composition / division

> "Every department cut its budget and became more efficient, so cutting the whole government's budget will make government more efficient." - **Fallacy of composition** (§4.1): macro effects (aggregate demand, cross-department dependencies) need not mirror the parts. Cross-ref the paradox of thrift...
Fallacy of composition
logic.md

4. The Complete Fallacy Taxonomy / 4.5 Causal and Statistical Fallacies

- **Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc** ⚙ (前後即因果の誤謬): "after, therefore because." - **False Cause** ⚙ (偽の原因): mistaking correlation, coincidence, or a common cause for direct causation. Cross-ref: `data_science.md` on confounders, reverse causation, and identification strategies. - **Texas Sharpshooter** ⚙ ...
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc False Cause Texas Sharpshooter Hasty Generalization Survivorship Bias Cherry picking
logic.md

4. The Complete Fallacy Taxonomy / 4.3 Fallacies of Presumption (unwarranted assumptions)

- **Circular Reasoning / Begging the Question** ⚙ (循環論法): the conclusion is smuggled into the premises. - **False Dilemma / False Dichotomy** ⚙ (偽の二者択一): presenting two options when more exist ("either total free markets or total state control"). - **Slippery Slope** ⚙ (滑り坂論法): claiming one step ine...
Circular Reasoning / Begging the Question False Dilemma / False Dichotomy Slippery Slope Loaded Question Nirvana Fallacy No True Scotsman
logic.md

11. Worked Examples (logic applied to real political arguments) / Example F — base rate neglect / prosecutor's fallacy

> "Our facial-recognition system is 99% accurate, so if it flags you at the protest, you're almost certainly guilty." - **Base-rate neglect (§7c)**: among 100,000 attendees with, say, 100 true suspects, a 1% false-positive rate flags ~1,000 innocents vs. ~99 of the guilty — so a flagged person is **...
Base-rate neglect (§7c) ~90% likely innocent Prosecutor's fallacy
logic.md

4. The Complete Fallacy Taxonomy / 4.2 Fallacies of Relevance (premises miss the point)

- **Ad Hominem** ⚙ (人身攻撃): attacking the person, not the argument. Subtypes: *abusive*, *circumstantial* ("you only say that because of your job"), *tu quoque*. - **Tu Quoque** ⚙ (お前だって論法): "you do it too" — deflecting criticism rather than answering it. - **Whataboutism** ⚙: a strategic tu quoque d...
Ad Hominem Tu Quoque Whataboutism Straw Man steelmanning Red Herring
logic.md

7c. Statistical Reasoning Fallacies

Innumeracy is a master source of political error. The most consequential traps: - **Base-rate neglect** ⚙-adjacent (§7): ignoring prior probability. The classic "screening paradox" — a 99%-accurate test for a 1-in-10,000 condition flags far more false positives than true ones (terrorist-detection, ...
Base-rate neglect Confusing P(A|B) with P(B|A) prosecutor's fallacy Simpson's paradox Regression to the mean Ecological fallacy

経済学 2

economics.md

Common Fallacies in Economic Arguments (Expanded)

1. **Ceteris paribus fallacy**: Holding all else equal when it cannot be 2. **Composition fallacy**: What's true for individual is true for economy (paradox of thrift) 3. **Post hoc ergo propter hoc**: Policy preceded outcome, therefore caused it 4. **Model reification**: Treating simplified models ...
Ceteris paribus fallacy Composition fallacy Post hoc ergo propter hoc Model reification Naturalistic fallacy Lump of labor fallacy
economics.md

Logical Patterns in Economic Arguments

1. **Ceteris paribus fallacy**: Holding all else equal when it cannot be 2. **Composition fallacy**: What's true for individual is true for economy (paradox of thrift) 3. **Post hoc ergo propter hoc**: Policy preceded outcome, therefore caused it 4. **Model reification**: Treating simplified models ...
Ceteris paribus fallacy Composition fallacy Post hoc ergo propter hoc Model reification Naturalistic fallacy

データサイエンス 2

data_science.md

Common Statistical Fallacies / Gambler's Fallacy / Hot Hand Fallacy

- **Gambler's fallacy**: Believing past events affect probability of future independent events ("we're due for a win") - **Hot hand fallacy**: Believing streaks are more likely than chance predicts (though recent research shows hot hand may exist in some contexts) - **Political application**: "This ...
Gambler's fallacy Hot hand fallacy Political application
data_science.md

Common Statistical Fallacies / Ecological Fallacy

- **Definition**: Inferring individual-level relationships from group-level data - **Example**: Rich districts vote for Candidate A; therefore rich individuals vote for Candidate A (may not be true — rich individuals in rich districts may vote differently from poor individuals in those same district...
Definition Example Reverse Political relevance

学際的テーマ 1

interdisciplinary.md

Meta-Principle: Levels of Analysis

Always specify the **level** at which a claim operates and beware sliding between them: - **Individual** (micro): preferences, psychology, choices. - **Institutional / organizational** (meso): rules, incentives, organizations. - **Structural / systemic** (macro): class, world-system, culture, long-r...
level Individual Institutional / organizational Structural / systemic Errors of level ecological fallacy

社会学 1

sociology.md

Debate Toolkit for Sociological Arguments / Distinguishing Levels of Analysis

- **Micro**: Individual behavior, interactions, meanings - **Meso**: Organizations, communities, networks - **Macro**: Societies, global systems, structural forces - **Key**: Don't confuse explanations at different levels; ecological fallacy (macro to micro); composition fallacy (micro to macro)
Micro Meso Macro Key
← midori-ai